Using the reading attached by James Rachels, “Active and Passive Euthanasia” wri

Using the reading attached by James Rachels, “Active and Passive Euthanasia” write 1200-1500 words on the following prompt. 
Prompt: According to James Rachels, there is no morally relevant difference between killing and letting die.  How does he argue for this claim?  Is his argument successful?
I have also attached a brief guide that our professor gave to us on how to write philosophy papers, as well as some notes on class, and my paper I wrote for the class earlier in the semester so you can try to match my writing style